Corrections and research independence

Request a correction

Use the contact details on About. Identify the robot, field or result, the proposed correction, the original source URL and relevant configuration or measurement conditions. A vendor submission goes through the same source checks as other research.

Unresolved conflicts remain visible. A newer citation does not automatically supersede an earlier claim: reviewers must establish that it refers to the same model, configuration and conditions. Published result withdrawals retain the signed package and a review reason.

Commercial independence

Payment, sponsorship and sales relationships must not change published scores, source verification labels or correction decisions. Any sponsored content or material relationship must be identified alongside the affected content. Reviewers must disclose relevant conflicts and refer affected decisions to another reviewer.

Measured results and accountability

A signed submission establishes its origin, not scientific validity. Publication requires review of the protocol version, configuration, trial outcomes, evidence tier and permission. Vendor-run, independently measured and replicated outcomes must not be conflated. Specification scores remain separate from measured results.

The platform does not promise a correction outcome or response deadline before the evidence has been reviewed. Historical snapshots record what the platform held at the time; they do not certify that those claims were correct.